Typesetting review: Tsuritama

Tsuritama typesetting review

Groups:Commie, WhyNot

Commie

(me)

This would probably look better with a third layer shifted like 1-2 pixels to the left.

This should be to the left and up a bit.

This is fine.

Yeah, this is my bad (more like why I shouldn’t encode because it’s off by one frame somehow).

While the font is okay here…

And decent here…

It’s far too thick here.

See above.

While this is aligned correctly it looks dumb. I blame the Japanese sign being rotated in a strange way.

Good.

Nothing wrong but it could be fancier.

Might look better as 2 layers.

WhyNot

No blur. Also, even if they wanted to use a shadow (which I did) it should be on the other side.

This should be 2 layers.

Color is off and the letters should be farther apart (i.e. use \fsp).

There’s a lot wrong with these (like no blur). Also, Yuki Keito is not a name, it’s two names. This sign should be composed of two separate parts.

At least these have blur.

Not nearly enough blur.

Font should be bigger, no blur.

Needs blur at the very least.

These are okay.

Grades

Commie: B. Some fonts could be a lot better (like the names).

WhyNot: C. Most of these are just there. Almost everything could be improved by better fonts and blur. Not sorted by time.

This entry was posted by herkzz.

2 thoughts on “Typesetting review: Tsuritama

You know you want to comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: